While the occasional glimpse of genius was still visible, the overall impression of his rants was that they were just plain boring and sad. He doesn't take anything else seriously, which is what used to make him fun to read - if he could stop taking himself so seriously, I'd enjoy his writing a lot more.
- estrogen great lakes dissertation.
- Blog Archive.
- essays to copy excalibur.
- Book Review: Eating the Dinosaur by Chuck Klosterman.
- cover letter account manager position.
- What is Kobo Super Points?.
- essays on irony in the crucible?
Most of the time I like what he writes, and occasionally I love certain pieces, or even parts of pieces. And I incidentally refer to him by his entire name, "Chuck Klosterman," because I cannot imagine the alternatives--or rather, I can, but I am uncomfortable with them. The weirdest part of this was reading it earlier this week Sunday, the 12th of September , and stopping before reaching the end, and then having dinner with friends, one of whom my very best friend heard an NPR report on the way to picking up dinner about how the Unabomber was deeply affected by some weird Cold War experiment at Harvard, and then going back to Chuck Klosterman's book, where the final essay was about.
I think my Facebook update about this said something to the effect that not since Don DeLillo's White Noise has a book reflected nearly exactly who I was and what I was thinking at a specific moment in history. I've since thought about maybe a half-dozen other books that did the same thing most recently Roberto Bolano's , but Klosterman's ease of access and rough-hewn prose, which is actually quite difficult to parse out to read to friends and loved ones so you end up reading nearly the whole thing out loud, to the consternation of the aforementioned , harkens back to DeLillo's effortless xeroxing of my brain back in the eighties.
In other words: I cannot recommend this book highly enough. View 1 comment. Nov 24, Gus Sanchez rated it it was amazing Shelves: favorites-you-should-read , essays. For one take on Eating the Dinosaur , check out Anthony Shafer's review , which kicks ass in it's own way. Chuck Klosterman's previous series of essays, Chuck Klosterman IV read more like a collection of rarities and half-formed ideas that left me wondering if Klosterman might be more enthralled with his celebrity as perhaps the pre-eminent pop culture essayist alive than being the pre-eminent pop culture essayist.
All those fears were put to rest after reading Eating the Dinosaur.
Chuck Klosterman on Sports: A Collection of Previously Published Essays
Simply put, Eating t For one take on Eating the Dinosaur , check out Anthony Shafer's review , which kicks ass in it's own way. Simply put, Eating the Dinosaur is the finest collection of essays Chuck Klosterman has ever penned. He even addresses those "sell out" fears in the first essay, attempting to reconcile his craft with his celebrity. It doesn't always work, Chuck writes, but there really is no other way.
The essays get better, stronger after that. His essay on the cult of personality surround Kurt Cobain takes a chilling and deadly accurate turn when he makes the link between Cobain and David Koresh, the apocalypse-spewing leader of the Branch Davidians. Not to say that Cobain was gunning for a Waco-style end of days, but both Cobain and Koresh attracted a cult of personality; one completely rejected it, when he should have embraced it, the other embraced it, when he should have rejected it.
Chuck Klosterman Is A Friend Of Mine: A Review of One Chapter In "Eating The Dinosaur"
This essay alone is worth the price of the book. Yet Klosterman saves his best essay for last; his rumination on the mad ramblings of Ted Kaczinski, aka the Unabomber, may be one of the best essays you'll read in a long time. Klosterman proves here he's not just the best pop-culture essayist alive, but one of the best essayists alive, period.
I felt as if Chuck wrote this book for me.
An Essay from Eating the Dinosaur
I've had conversations like the essays he's penned in this collection. I'm sorry I doubted you, Chuck. Oct 28, ReaderM rated it really liked it. Eating the Dinosaur is a simple collection of essays that will slightly twist your mind but present a pleasant read. In reading the 'Easting the Dinosaur' you could say this is just a cheap collection of essays by a guy whose editors told him; "hey it's been a while since you released a book" throw something together quick.
I honestly wouldn't disagree with that assertion one bit yet it's to the credit of the writing style and prose of Klosterman that he can turn that into a excellent read. Like Sports, this book has a section for you. Love Music, well it's Klosterman, of course there is a section for you. Even some totally random and inverted comparisons of within make it worth my time.
It is a literary classic, no but it's a great lazy read to cruel up with on lazy evening night and digest some good writing. Klosterman is hit or miss with me, but once I just sort of skipped the essays about sports, this was a very good collection. Though the essay comparing David Koresh and Kurt Cobain is the most notorious, the best essay for me was "T is For True," a discussion of irony and its application, or rather lack thereof, in the careers of Weezer, Werner Herzog, and Ralph Nader.
Not a book review. Klosterman and David Foster Wallace are right: irony tyrannizes us. But part of the reason that it tyrannizes us is because people will not shut up about it.
It's exhausting trying to out-smart and pre-empt every clever person who's ever had a theory on pop culture and society. We all speak in the ridiculous voice of Wallace Shawn: "Perhaps you know that I know that you know that I know. Most sensible people have stopped talking altogether. I think Foster Wallace finally realized this.
But this is how we think, dammit, and it deserves props for being a lucid representation of that thinking. Amazingly, the sports essays were not my least favorite. More than that, I actually liked them! The football essay particularly surprised me. I've been warming up to football over the years, but I've never stopped to consider why, exactly. I've had suspicions, but I think it might have come to me in reading Klosterman's essay. I like football because I like Star Trek. You heard me, ensign. I want you to ram the Enterprise into the enemy flag ship in a little stratagem I like to call The Kobayashi Mmmmmmutha-fucka-didn't-see-that-comin!
This is the equivalent of the QB running the ball and hoping his precious legs aren't snapped like twigs in the process. But it's not just the sucker punch element I enjoy. It's the outsmarting aspect. The tactical aspect where you're just trying to figure out what they think you think their weak spot is and adjusting the plan accordingly. How can we sneak the Defiant through this mass of Dominion ships to the Bajoran Wormhole?
18 Football Books for Football Haters
We run a distraction play using the Valiant as a decoy. There's also the weird parallel of fantasy football and text-based rpgs. I really have no idea how either one works, but I get that it's the same concept. They love to sit around and discuss alternate realities which might help to explain why I've been loving this strip lately.
I don't like sports and I don't like the military. I enjoy football only a little more than chess by which I mean that I appreciate the concepts more the the actual gameplay , and I can get behind Trek because it's fictionalized military in an altruistic future. I guess we all feel that way about interests we don't share.
Wallace Shawn for Captain!
NPR Choice page
A few years ago, I picked up my new much younger girlfriend in NY to drive her back to Boston for her new semester. She asked to drive my car because it was a Mustang and, as she drove, I looked in the backseat and found a wrinkled photocopy I had made of an especially powerful Cesar Vallejo poem. I pulled it out and read it to her. She looked over at me and said, "Who are you? Here I was with this college girl, in the first car I'd ever been happy owning, and for the first time in memory able to read a poem to another person without pausing over all the wrong bits.
But the relationship didn't work out and I've slowly come around to why it couldn't have. It was all in her emphasis of "are. The relationship failed in part not because of the age gap, but because we interacted with the world in a fundamentally different way ok, maybe that's an age gap. There was always a layer of irony in her world and she couldn't conceive that I wasn't also living that way.
Of course, none of this was helped by the fact that I met her through a craigslist missed connection, using her ironic t-shirt as an identifier. The age gap wasn't so great that I didn't get the concept. I can think of dozens of situations where I deliberately acted ironically. But I feel like it's gotten to a point the point of flarf where people don't even know what their social circle is talking about, but they keep gibbering on, pretending that it's fine.
In fact, "It's fine" was a sort of catch-phrase of hers. More recently, I again sat in a car with a girl this time a peer , discussing poetry, which had been the basis of our friendship. I recounted the Vallejo story and said that I was worried not just that we were getting older, but that people, "the kids", really were losing their aptitude for genuine discourse. She looked down and said, "Yes. Irony tyrannizes us all and yet I keep talking.
internetincomecrashcourse.com/2137-cell-phone-monitoring.php While I appreciate the sentiment, it's pretty misguided. First of all, you would never say, "let's never speak Stalin's name again. Contrary to popular opinion, killing is not advertising; if you ignore killers, they're not simply going to go away. But if you ignore humanity, that will disappear. I feel like Klosterman could write a decent essay on this topic.
Oddly enough, for much of my elementary school life, Kurt Cobain and David Koresh were interchangeable in my mind. Mar 04, Dan rated it really liked it Shelves: non-fiction , read-in , audio-book.